A New Hope
By Mike Barako - Precinct #195150091A Captain - CA CD 29 - PasadenaForObama.org - Freethinkers & Friends For Obama - Jun 25th, 2008 at 6:04 pm EDT
Also listed in: 10 groups Comments Mail to a Friend Report Objectionable Content
Lucas: Obama is a Jedi POSTED June 25, 2:48 AM
George Lucas signs an autograph at a Capitol Hill event Tuesday. - Carrie Devorah/Special to The Examinerhttp://www.examiner.com/blogs-73-Yeas_and_Nays~y2008m6d25-Lucas-Obama-is-a-Jedi"Star Wars" creator George Lucas used his expert opinion to compare some of his famous characters to famous politicians Tuesday morning.Lucas, who was on Capitol Hill to testify at the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Telecommunications and the Internet subcommittee hearing on universal service, was totally nonpartisan when it came to President Bush, declining to weigh in on our question: "Who is President Bush more like: Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader?""It's up to the viewer," he responded.And, of course, we had to ask him what he thinks of Vice President Dick Cheney's nickname -- "Darth Vader."Although Lucas wouldn't say whether it was an accurate description of the veep, he did say that Cheney "seems to like" the nickname.Lucas did, however, have one definitive answer: Barack Obama would most certainly be a Jedi. "I would say that's reasonably obvious," he said.And although Lucas' movies are filled with high-tech graphics and visual wizardry, he says they're nothing compared with Congress, telling us that getting things done there is much more complicated than his movies' special effects. "Anyone who's seen one of my movies knows that's saying something about Congress," he said.
Mail to a Friend Link Comments (1) Report Objectionable Content
Reader Comments Write a Comment on this Post Comments RSS
Agree With George Lucas on Sen. Obama Report to Admin Reply
By Hamzi Yazbeck ...Friends ...President Obama provides inspiration, vigor and innovtion America needs to overcome Jun 29th 2008 at 11:41 pm EDT Delete Comment
Sen. Obama is much more than the Jedi he would more likely be their PRESIDENT.
Teach The Children Organizing!: Camp Obama Crew Pasadena :-P
By Mike Barako - Precinct #195150091A Captain - CA CD 29 - PasadenaForObama.org - Freethinkers & Friends For Obama - Jun 16th, 2008 at 12:11 pm EDT
Also listed in: 9 groups
Famed organizer Marshall Ganz sees history in the makingThe longtime UFW activist, who was there when RFK was shot, is now putting his passion to work for Barack Obama.By Scott Martelle, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer June 15, 2008 CAMBRIDGE, MASS. -- Forty years ago Marshall Ganz, a top field organizer for Cesar Chavez's United Farm Workers union, watched in confusion as Bobby Kennedy left a stage at Los Angeles' Ambassador Hotel.Ganz was supposed to whisk him away to thank a roomful of farmworker volunteers who had just helped him win the 1968 California Democratic presidential primary. But Kennedy was heading toward the kitchen.Before Ganz could catch up, the room erupted in screams and yells. Robert F. Kennedy had been shot."Talk about feeling history just falling through your fingers," Ganz said.Ganz is sitting at his kitchen table as he tells the story, one in a series of personal narratives from his life as a rabbi's son in 1950s Bakersfield, a civil rights worker in Mississippi in the 1960s and, later, a key figure in the United Farm Workers' boycotts.They are stories of faith and betrayal, love and hate, hope and disillusionment.And if Barack Obama succeeds in his historic quest for the White House, the Illinois senator will owe a large debt to Ganz's passion for such narratives -- and for the way this graying, portly man taught Obama's top field organizers to weave thousands of individual volunteers' stories into a social movement.Ganz, 65, has no official role in the Obama campaign. But when key Obama organizers run into a problem, they look to Ganz, who teaches organizing and leadership at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.When the Obama campaign held a series of "Camp Obama" training sessions around the country last summer, Ganz was brought in to hold two-day discussions of personal narrative and leadership.Campaign officials estimate that 200 to 300 organizers were trained at about a dozen Camp Obamas -- three of them co-led by Ganz.The effort's biggest success came in caucus states like Iowa, where tightknit organizations were better able to get people to the meeting sites.But grass-roots efforts also paid off in South Carolina and Wisconsin and helped keep the margin small in Indiana.Ganz's "style of organizing really does speak to who Barack is as a candidate," said Obama field organizer Buffy Wicks, 30, who ran the campaign's grass-roots efforts in California and Texas."Marshall really believes in empowering people and teaching them how to become community organizers."Maggie Fleming, who attended a Camp Obama last summer, said: "Marshall is able to bring this bigger picture of his work with civil rights and with the farmworkers and [connect] people to this idea that this is bigger than just one candidate."Fleming, 28, the assistant director of a nonprofit environmental education group, later helped form the core of Obama's grass-roots committee in Oakland.Ganz encourages volunteers to share their own life stories with voters, in the belief that by speaking from the heart, they turn the tedious -- phone-banking, door-knocking -- into a communal mission. It's not policy but passion that he teaches."It's counterintuitive," Ganz said. "At Camp Obama the tendency is, 'I need to know all of the arguments.' No. You need to learn to talk from your own experiences. It's a very empowering thing."For Ganz too. He sees the campaign as a chance to turn back the hands of time.Freedom Summer
Ganz was born in Bay City, Mich., and grew up in Fresno and then Bakersfield.He entered Harvard in 1960 but after two years took some time off. When he returned to Cambridge, he found that one of his roommates had joined Students for a Democratic Society and another had joined the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.He volunteered for the Freedom Summer of 1964 in Mississippi and was in training when volunteers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner disappeared. They were found dead several weeks later.Ganz decided to forge ahead -- and found his life's work."I had friends involved in SDS, and they would have these big ideological discussions, which never had any appeal to me," Ganz said. "What worked for me was to work with the people, going around and meeting people."As a way to connect with the black community, the rabbi's son taught adult Sunday school in Mississippi -- Old Testament only. Ganz returned to the Central Valley in 1965 and soon joined Chavez's fledgling farmworkers union, where he helped organize workers, lead boycotts and negotiate contracts until internal divisions led him to quit in 1981.He then moved into political organizing full time, targeting infrequent voters.The strategy turned out 180,000 new voters, primarily in low-income Latino and black neighborhoods, who helped Sen. Alan Cranston win a tight reelection battle in 1986. In 1991, 28 years after he left, Ganz was back in Cambridge, where he earned a master's degree and, in 2000, a doctorate and then marked another transition: from student to teacher.The challengeGanz stands at the front of a Harvard lecture hall, a diet Dr Pepper on the table in front of him. About 80 students fill the room, some from the Kennedy School, others from the Divinity School."Today we get into leadership," Ganz says. It is a skill most needed during times of uncertainty, he says, and best done by forming teams."Do not try to organize your project alone," he says, a titter moving through the crowd. "Get other people to help you. . . . It's not so much about exercising your own leadership as it is developing the leadership capacity of others. That's where the power comes from."For the next 80 minutes, Ganz lectures a bit but also poses questions. He doesn't nudge the students toward any specific engagement, but it's clear that several have the political bug.For a class project, Norena Limon, 25, of Chino was planning to skip a few days of classes to help Obama's grass-roots efforts out of state.Limon represents the long-term challenge for the Obama campaign -- and for Ganz: how to harness and nurture the enthusiasm of the young and the idealistic, whose energy could dissipate if Obama fails to win the White House.Ganz has faith that the seeds have taken root. If Obama loses, many of the disenchanted will disengage. But others will stay involved as community activists. They will organize others.Forty years after history slipped through Ganz's fingers, he feels optimistic again."I just love the fact that hundreds of organizers are going to be unleashed on the country," he said, sitting with his coffee mug at the kitchen table amid all those stories. It's Marshall Ganz's army, and it's marching your way.scott.martelle@latimes.com Read More »
Mail to a Friend Link Comments (0) Report Objectionable Content
Billary's Legacy (from Huff): Don't Let Others Re-Write History!
By Mike Barako - Precinct #195150091A Captain - CA CD 29 - PasadenaForObama.org - Freethinkers & Friends For Obama - May 11th, 2008 at 8:43 am EDT
Also listed in: 9 groups
Hillary Clinton's Legacy : Two months ago I wrote about the emerging parallels between the bitterness of the current Democratic primary and the split between early white women's rights activists and abolitionists after the Civil War. With the campaign of Hillary Clinton sputtering to its final end, it is appropriate to revisit these issue and see if the disturbing parallels I pointed out have increased or decreased in relevancy since March.
Unfortunately, the historic parallels have only become stronger, and are nearly perfectly crystallized in yesterday's New York Times op-ed by Susan Faludi, the award-winning white feminist author, congratulating Clinton for running a campaign that has advanced the feminist movement in America:
In the final stretch of the primary season, [Clinton] seems to have stepped across an unstated gender divide...We are witnessing a female competitor delighting in the undomesticated fray. Her new no-holds-barred pugnacity and gleeful perseverance have revamped her image in the eyes of begrudging white male voters... It's the unforeseen precedent of an unprecedented candidacy... Not once has she demanded that the umpire stop the fight. Indeed, she's asking for more unregulated action, proposing a debate with no press-corps intermediaries. While the commentators have been tut-tutting, Senator Clinton has been converting white males, assuring them that she's come into their tavern not to smash the bottles, but to join the brawl. ... The strategy has certainly remade the political world for future female politicians, who may now cast off the assumption that when the going gets tough, the tough girl will resort to unilateral rectitude. When a woman does ascend through the glass ceiling into the White House, it will be, in part, because of the race of 2008, when Hillary Clinton broke through the glass floor and got down with the boys.
My original post comparing the present situation to that following the Civil War is included below. The short version is this: after the war, a major schism erupted among abolitionists over whether to campaign first to grant the vote to former (male) slaves, and then to press extend the vote to women (of all colors), or whether to fight for both at the same time. When it became clear that the majority of abolitionists favored pressing the black vote first, two of the most prominent white women's rights activists broke with the movement and began to campaign for white woman suffrage on explicitly racist grounds. They argued that giving white women the vote would protect the nation from the unsavory political influence of former slaves and Asian immigrants. The result was a split in the movement for woman suffrage that hobbled that movement for 50 years.
Faludi's argument fits into this historic parallel perfectly. Clinton, we are told, has done a favor for all American women by campaigning with "new no-holds-barred pugnacity" and "joining the brawl." Incredibly, Faludi neglects to mention the content of what Clinton's closest advisors referred to last week as her display of testicles: racism and war-mongering.
The day after the most recent primaries, Clinton told USA Today that she must continue because she has growing support among "working, hard working Americans. White Americans." It is worth your while to go to YouTube and hear this statement for yourself. When you hear her inflection, it comes off even worse than it does in print. She begins to say that Obama is losing support among "working" Americans, then pauses to specify what she is actually referring to is "hard working Americans," then pauses and specifies even more precisely "white" Americans. She then continues, noting that "whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."
OK, Hillary, we hear you. As opposed to all those lazy blacks and do-nothing white college grads, you've got the support of the people who actually work hard in this country - uneducated white people. That is, in essence, exactly the appeal made by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton after the Civil War: the same argument, made to mobilize the same constituency.
The first time around, this agenda created a split in the movement for woman suffrage that would hobble the movement for 50 long years until American women finally won the right to vote in 1920. The whole sordid history is a painful chapter in American feminism that causes American feminists discomfort even today, nearly 150 years later. Some feminists have promoted Anthony and Stanton as historical heroines and role models, and in the 1970s Anthony became the first woman to appear on American money when the Susan B. Anthony dollar was minted. Other feminists strongly object, arguing that ignoring the racist legacy of these women only exacerbates the racial divisions that have plagued feminism in America.
But racism was not the only appeal on which Clinton based what Faludi sees as her effort to "remake the political world for future female politicians." The other was war. In order to convince those uneducated white voters that she had sufficient testosterone to be Commander-in-Chief-from-Day-One, she flatly stated that she would have no qualms about "obliterating" another country, leading her confidant James Carville to state that if Hillary gave Obama one of her balls, "they'd both have two."
This statement, coming from a leading presidential candidate in the only country in the world to ever have used nuclear weapons, was so egregious that it merited a rebuke from the Secretary General of the United Nations. I cannot remember another time when any world leader in any country, trying to drum up last minute votes in an election, made a statement so outrageous as to draw comment from the UN Secretary General.
So, no, I cannot agree with Faludi that Clinton's "strategy has certainly remade the political world for future female politicians." It is simply not news that a female politician who outdoes the guys in appeals to race and war can be successful. Think Margaret Thatcher. The fact that she ran on a machine largely created by her husband, whom she regularly employed to wallow in a gutter even lower than that to which she herself had sunk, makes Faludi's argument even more ludicrous. Incredibly, in Faludi's entire article summing up the political impact of the Clinton campaign, the words "Bill," "William," and "husband" do not appear. Clinton has not even withdrawn yet and the re-writing of history has already begun.
Here is my post from March:
The recent behavior of the Clinton campaign and its allies has disturbing parallels in the earliest days of the woman suffrage movement. Then, in the face of a short-term set-back, the most prominent woman suffrage campaigners broke with the abolitionist movement and espoused explicitly racist politics. The result was a debilitating split in the movement for woman suffrage, and a half century of defeat.
The women in question are Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. Like other early women's rights advocates, Stanton and Anthony initially became politically active in the abolitionist movement, and through this activism began formulating an increasingly articulate feminist agenda (though the word "feminism" was not available to them at the time).
The civil war put women's rights on hold, as abolitionist women threw their energies into the union war effort. After the war, the question of voting rights for freed slaves moved to the top of the national agenda. Slavery was ended, but whether the freed slaves would be granted the full rights of citizens, and most particularly the right to vote, was anything but certain. To Stanton and Anthony, the debate on voting rights was an open door for a push to extend the vote to all adult citizens regardless of race or gender. They took it as given that the political coalition which had achieved abolition and was now poised to campaign for the Fourteenth Amendment would see things the same way. It was inconceivable to them that the nation might grant the vote to black men yet leave black women - and white women - disenfranchised.
Most abolitionist leaders, including prominent white women such as Lucy Stone, took an opposite tack, arguing that it was the "Negro's hour" and women would have to wait. In their view, while black suffrage and woman suffrage might be linked logically, the political reality was that the fight for black male suffrage would be a difficult one, and complicating the matter by raising woman suffrage would put the fruits of the tremendous sacrifices of the civil war in jeopardy. Victory for black suffrage, they argued, would open the door for women, whereas a defeat for black suffrage would close all possibility of enlarging the franchised population for years to come. Those advocating this course included movement superstars William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass, both of whom had consistently been far ahead of the pack in their support of female abolitionists formulating a program for women's rights.
The issue came to a head in 1867 in Kansas, where citizens were asked to vote simultaneously on two separate constitutional amendments, one enfranchising black men, the other women. The outcome would finally decide the debate over whether the political rights of slaves would be defined as the "[male] Negro's hour" or a "more complete democracy." With so much on the line, the split between those campaigning for just one or both amendments became predictably bitter. On election day black suffrage won, while woman suffrage lost overwhelmingly.
The real political catastrophe, however, was not this set-back but the ugly politics that ensued. What had begun as a principled disagreement with reasoned arguments on both sides degenerated into a political debacle as one side in the debate refused to accept that its position would lose. Stanton and Anthony had been the most prominent woman suffrage campaigners in the Kansas election, and as they sensed victory slipping beyond their reach they tried to shore up their prospects by reaching out to racists. They developed a close relationship with a flamboyant racist named George Francis Train, who stumped for them around the state. Attacks on the intelligence of blacks were fundamental to Train's standard appeal, and he employed them as an argument for voting rights for women. The collaboration between two top woman suffragists and such a blatant racist horrified many other suffragists. Stanton and Anthony shocked their friends by refusing to budge in the face of withering criticism. "So long as opposition to slavery is the only test for your platform," Stanton angrily wrote to the abolitionists, "why should we not accept all in favor of woman suffrage to our platform and association, even though they be rabid pro-slavery?"
The following year, Stanton, Anthony and Train launched the Revolution, a newspaper which broke much new ground for women's rights in America, discussing prostitution, infanticide, sex education, cooperative housekeeping. But the paper also carried on with explicitly racist appeals to white women. "American women of wealth, education, virtue, and refinement," Stanton warned, "If you do not wish the lower orders of Chinese, Africans, Germans and Irish, with the low ideas of womanhood to make laws for you and your daughters, ... to dictate not only the civil, but moral codes by which you shall be governed, awake to the danger of your present position."
Thus began a split in the movement for woman suffrage that would hobble the movement for 50 long years until American women finally won the right to vote in 1920. The whole sordid history is a painful chapter that causes American feminists discomfort even today. Some feminists have promoted Anthony and Stanton as historical heroines and role models, and in the 1970s Anthony became the first woman to appear on American money when the Susan B. Anthony dollar was minted. Other feminists have strongly objected, arguing that ignoring the racist legacy of these women only exacerbates the racial divisions that have plagued feminism in America.
The parallels with today are obvious. As the Clinton campaign began to feel the chances of Hillary Clinton becoming the first female president slip away, the campaign has resorted to increasingly racist appeals. One wonders if, decades from now, Hillary Clinton will be a hero in the feminist pantheon or, like Stanton and Anthony, a reminder of a painful episode that future feminists will prefer to forget.
Mail to a Friend Link Comments (1) Report Objectionable Content
Progressive Post from Huff: Don't Worry, Be Happy!
By Mike Barako - Precinct #195150091A Captain - CA CD 29 - PasadenaForObama.org - Freethinkers & Friends For Obama - Apr 22nd, 2008 at 11:46 am EDT
Also listed in: 9 groups
In hope of preventing some of this hysteria (especially my own), I thought it'd be helpful to keep a few things in mind during Tuesday night's results -- from Hillary's "victory" speech to the blizzard of spin that's sure to follow:
1. Remember that there's no way Hillary can become the nominee without a superdelegate coup -- which would alienate a generation of young Democrats and dangerously fracture the party.
2. Remember that her campaign leaked internals showing an eleven point lead (as a means of firing up her supporters and getting out the vote). Therefore, any win smaller than eleven points should be considered a disappointment by her own assessment.
3. Remember that every time Hillary begins a sentence with "you know," or "my opponent," the next thing out of her mouth is a lie.
4. Remember that when Clinton surrogates say "this proves Obama can't win the big states," they're ignoring the fact that he actually won more delegates in Texas -- not to mention twice as many states as she has.
5. Remember that when the pundits argue that Obama can't win in white rural areas because they broke for Hillary, they're ignoring the fact that he won (in alphabetical order): Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
6. Remember that when Hillary talks about who will be "better against John McCain in the fall," she's talking about the fall of 2012.
7. Remember that Hillary's campaign is $10M in debt, while Obama's has more than $40M in cash on hand.
8. Remember that Hillary's lead in Pennsylvania was as a high as 26 points only a month ago.
9. Remember that Hillary's late Pennsylvania rebound was forged in the fires of negativity and fear-mongering.
10. Remember that the only manufacturing job Hillary ever brought to Pennsylvania was the manufactured notion that she was a middle-class, whisky-swilling duck killer, and not an anti-union multi-millionaire. Read More »
Mail to a Friend Link Comments (1) Report Objectionable Content
yes we can Report to Admin Reply
By Julia from Pasadena Apr 22nd 2008 at 12:35 pm EDT
Delete Comment
Remember she is doing very poorly for someone who supposedly has the nomination in the bag.Inevitable you say?
Obama Backers Rev Up Efforts - Pasadena Star News - Free Media+New Media!
By Mike Barako - Precinct #195150091A Captain - CA CD 29 - PasadenaForObama.org - Freethinkers & Friends For Obama - Dec 27th, 2007 at 12:45 pm EST
Also listed in: 10 groups
San Gabriel Valley volunteers excited by Sen. Barack Obama's past as a community organizer - and his local ties - are working through the holiday season for his presidential campaign.
Local groups work overtime on behalf of Dem candidate
By Dan Abendschein, Staff Writer Article Launched: 12/26/2007 10:48:35 PM PST
A Pasadena group will be canvassing for Obama at the South Pasadena farmers market today, as it does most weeks, and a Monrovia group held its regular phone-banking session Wednesday night.
Throughout Los Angeles County, Obama volunteers are divided into groups based on congressional districts, and volunteers from each group learned how to organize their groups, make phone calls and canvass for their candidate at a central event held last June, called "Camp Obama."
"I was amazed how much some of our volunteers learned about running a campaign from attending the event," said Julia Bailey, 42, a volunteer in the 32nd Congressional District.
The 32nd Congressional District is represented by Hilda Solis, D-El Monte. It includes the communities East Los Angeles, El Monte, Covina, West Covina and Azusa.
Bailey added that she thought the camps were particularly helpful because so many volunteers are political novices.
"This is my first time getting involved in politics, and it is the same for everyone I talk to in the campaign," said Bailey.
Lonnee Hamilton, a organizer for the 29th Congressional District group in Pasadena, agreed that few in her group had ever been politically active.
"I was just a hold your nose and vote Democratic person," said Hamilton. "This is my first time actually volunteering, and I talk to other volunteers who say they haven't even voted in 30 years."
The 29th Congressional District, which is represented by Democrat Adam Schiff, includes the communities of Monterey Park, Altadena, Pasadena, Temple City, San Gabriel and Alhambra.
Hamilton hosted a fundraiser at her aunt and uncle's house for Obama that she says raised more than $500,000.
Obama attended the event and excited people by talking about his time spent in Pasadena while attending Occidental College, she added.
Mike Barako, 33, a special education teacher in Pasadena and volunteer in the group, said Obama appeals to him because of the senator's time spent as a community organizer in Illinois.
"He is a good community leader who has shown he wants to help local people solve their problems," said Barako, who added that he had never volunteered for any other candidate.
For now, groups from the 19th, 32nd, and 26th district say they are having dozens of volunteers call voters in their areas to ask them to support Obama, but in the weeks running up to California's Feb. 5 primary they plan to be out knocking on doors.
"So far we have only been able to use a few dozen people for phones," said Hamilton. "But hundreds of people have shown willingness to volunteer, so we'll be out in full force next month."
dan.abendschein@sgvn.com
(626) 962-8811, Ext. 2105
Mail to a Friend Link Comments (1) Report Objectionable Content
Nice! Report to Admin Reply
By Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein Dec 27th 2007 at 1:44 pm EST
Delete Comment
Congrats on the mention.
------------
http://barackobamagrassroots.com/blog/2007/04/03/httpfreethinkerspasadenablogspotcom/
Posted on April 3rd, 2007 by Administrator
If you are looking for a Blog in the California area that cuts right to the point, this is the site for you. Free Thinkers Pasadena started their campaigning efforts in February and offer the chance for members from the community to come together in support of Barack Obama, while also providing discounted materials to supporters. The group is very astute in displaying campaigning numbers, including approval ratings, schedules of upcoming events, and links to hundreds of other Barack Obama campaigns (Mostly from the official http://www.barackobama.com/ website). Most, if not all of the posts derive from http://www.pasadenaforobama.org/. If you are in the California area and you are looking for a group that is organized, willing to help you get involved, and has a genuine passion for Senator Obama’s campaign, then this is the group for you.
Sincerely,
James Allen Johnson
Technorati Tags: Pasadena Democrats, California Democrats, Barack Obama, Primaries
OBAMALA.COM Offers a Los Angeles Welcome to ObamaPosted on April 3rd, 2007 by AdministratorAs the name suggests http://www.obamala.com/ is a grassroots support group in the Los Angeles area, the site offers a professional layout with a vast array of important Barack Obama information. The site operates much like http://www.barackobama.com/ offering a contribution link, calendars, get involved links, Barack Obama News, Contact info, and a link for Pics and Videos. Another unique featuring from the site is their very own Barack Obama store, where participants can purchase, buttons and t-shirts (with a pretty cool looking drawing of Senator Obama featured on them). My favorite part of the site however is their “Weekly Speech Pick,” displaying the best of Barack Obama speeches, the speechs are from past years up until the present, and they show that Obama is unwavering in his positions on many issues facing many Americans today.I give this site excellent marks for their orderly displays and their ability to cover a vast array of Barack Obama information. By the way, their donate tabs send you right to the official http://www.barackobama.com/ site so you know where the money is being spent.Sincerely,James Allen JohnsonTechnorati Tags: Los Angeles Democrats, Primaries, Barack Obama, Voters 1 Comment »Filed under: California
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment